This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Viruses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of viruses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirusesWikipedia:WikiProject VirusesTemplate:WikiProject Virusesvirus articles
Expand the section on her research contributions A LOT. You need to read the summary of her work on her website and other sources you have used, as well as reading the introduction to many of her articles (especially the ones at the top of the list that have over 100 citations). This will help you understand her research and its context, as well as the proper terminology, etc. You should have 2-3 nice paragraphs in this section.
Add a scientist infobox
The memberships, editorial boards, and filmography (cool) sections are fine.
This page should not be speedily deleted because... I understand that there are rules specific for Wikipedia article writing, but I have never written a Wikipedia article before, and I am still learning. Instead of saying that it should be deleted right away, I would appreciate it if other Wikipedia editors wrote what they deem to be wrong, and list suggestions as to how I should fix it. To be honest compassionate727, I do not understand what you have deemed wrong with this article so far, and I would greatly appreciate it if someone could explain. I am not finished editing this article, so again, I would really, really, really like it if Wikipedia did not delete it. Please. Owenspg (talk) 01:34, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]